The Canon 28mm ƒ/2.8 IS USM offers passably good performance for macro work: 0.2x magnification, with a minimum close-focusing distance of 23 cm (9 inches). Build Quality and Handling. Canon uses
It's sharp across the frame, it's decently fast, has IS, and is small/light! What's not to love? Well, the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM is f/3.5 at 23mm. That's only 2/3 of a stop and 1mm difference. Although the 18-55 isn't quite as sharp at that setting as the EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM is wide open - it's decently close (there's a noticeable The 24mm f/2.8 doesn't rotate or extend during operation, whereas the 28mm f/2.8 has a filter thread section that moves in and out when focusing. As with the 50mm f/1.8 MkII I am wary of screwing
The Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 USM IS and EF 35mm f/2 USM IS delivered pretty impressive results in our lab. Can the Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 USM IS continue this tradition ? Unfortunately it doesn't quite convince as much. The image quality is far from being bad in general but it could be clearly better at f/2.8 at least.
This lens is a massive, eye-opening improvement from the original EF 24mm F/2.8. Sharpness is dramatically improved, flare reduced, improved color, and IS added. At this focal length, IS is less useful for general shooting, but still can be used for certain types of specialty shots and video. Also, while it is not as sharp as the EF 24-70 f/2
The Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM is a capable but pricey ultra wideangle prime that will appeal most to landscape and reportage photographers looking for a lightweight and responsive lens. Despite it's lack of an L-series billing, the Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 IS USM build quality is reassuringly good and it makes a good partner to a full-frame Canon The IS version is definitely sharper. However, in saying that, my 24 non IS is still a tiny bit sharper at f/2.8 than my 24-105L is at 24 mm & f/4. I bought it for landscape/closeup type shots, so generally stop it down a bit, so not at all concerned that the corners are a wee bit soft wide open.
